From: "Jimmy" <blue0ne2000@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.econ,alt.politics.economics,alt.peace
Subject: Re: The United Nations is irresponsible
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 23:16:25 -0400
Just because an organization has not accomplished fully their goal... does not mean they have no reason d'etre.
HATTORI nobuo <hattorin@ta2.so-net.ne.jp> wrote in message
> The United Nations is irresponsible and has no raison d'etre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------From: Mason Clark <masonc@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.econ,alt.politics.economics,alt.peace
Subject: Re: The United Nations is irresponsible
Followup-To: sci.econ
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 22:50:38 -0700
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 11:50:26 +0900, hattorin@ta2.so-net.ne.jp (HATTORI nobuo) wrote:
> The United Nations is irresponsible and has no raison d'etre.
Important point. But can they "eradicate poverty"? That is the problem. Development requires stable, benevolent government and the rule of law -- dependable law. This is where the U.N. had failed. Despotic regimes have been welcomed into the U.N. They should have been excluded in accordance with the U.N. charter and its Bill of Rights (by the way: which I think the U.S. never ratified).
Hattori, I hope you continue to post. We need you. Don't get pushed off by the fools who reside here in the dark of night.
Mason C
----------------------------------------------------------------------From: "Robert Vogel" <vogel@mail.snet.net>
Newsgroups: sci.econ,alt.politics.economics,alt.peace
References: <hattorin-1310011150260001@p8027b7.fnbspc00.ap.so-net.ne.jp> <9q8bgu$qrt$1@bob.news.rcn.net>
Subject: Re: The United Nations is irresponsible
A Nobel Peace Prize is an accomplishment. How do you suppose Khoffi Annan got that ?
"Jimmy" <blue0ne2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9q8bgu$qrt$1@bob.news.rcn.net...
> Just because an organization has not accomplished fully their goal... does
> not mean they have no reason d'etre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "9" <dontbother@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: sci.econ,alt.politics.economics,alt.peace
References: <hattorin-1310011150260001@p8027b7.fnbspc00.ap.so-net.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: The United Nations is irresponsible
The UN is not impartial - they support the Bush Alliance for world Hatred - as such they are just a pawn of the capitalist backers. they will eventualy be used as the basis for establishing a world order controlled by these backers.
The UN has proved it is complicit by it's support. Please tell me i am not wrong - please tell me the UN does not support this barbaric act. - i think you cannot.
HATTORI nobuo <hattorin@ta2.so-net.ne.jp> wrote in message
news:hattorin-1310011150260001@p8027b7.fnbspc00.ap.so-net.ne.jp...
> The United Nations is irresponsible and has no raison d'etre.